• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Exam question

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Exam question

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 19, 2021 at 8:43 pm #611017
    pateladam
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Option 1

    GG Co could suspend dividends for two years, and then pay dividends of 30 cents per share from the end of the third year, increasing dividends annually by 5% per year in subsequent years. Dividends in recent years have grown by 4% per year

    a) Using the dividend valuation model, calculate the value of GG Co under option 1, and advise whether option 1 will be acceptable to shareholders.

    The answer they got was:

    2.4/(0·10 – 0.05) = $48 million

    The dividend valuation model value (the capital value of the dividends at year 0) will be:

    48/1·1 2 = $39·65 million

    The current present value of dividends to shareholders, using the existing 4% dividend growth rate:

    (1.4 x 1.04)/(0.10 – 0.04) = $24·27 million

    The proposal will increase shareholder wealth by 39.65 – 24.27 = $15·38 million and so is likely to be
    acceptable to shareholders.

    Please can you explain why in step 2 they divided 48 to 1.12 to get 39.65 and why this method is taken? also why in step 3 they divided by 1.04?

    February 20, 2021 at 8:04 am #611050
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You have not typed out the whole question because you have not stated the cost of equity. I assume that it is 10%.

    The dividend valuation formula gives the market value at time 0 when the first dividend is in 1 years time.

    Here, the first dividend is in 3 years time, which is 2 years later than in 1 years time. Therefore the answer from the formula is 2 years later i.e. time 2 instead of time 0.
    So the answer from the formula needs discounting for 2 years at 10%. You can either use the discount factor from the tables provided, or multiply by 1/(1.1^2)

    I do explain this, with examples, in my free lectures because it is a common question in the exam. The lectures are a complete free course for Paper FM and cover everything needed to be able to pass the exam well.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • NirajNathani99 on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AKN1989 on Linear Programming – Maximum contribution – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Motsotase910 on Contingent Assets and Liabilities – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Kim Smith on ACCA F2 Key to success

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in