• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

EVA – technical artical

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA APM Exams › EVA – technical artical

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Ken Garrett.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 10, 2020 at 7:46 pm #588542
    lilygao
    Member
    • Topics: 11
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Dear Ken,

    A question regarding the article posted on the website:

    https://opentuition.com/forum/ask-acca-tutor-forums/ask-the-tutor-acca-advanced-performance-management-apm-exams/

    Example 3:

    3. At the end of 2008, the company had completed another research and development project, Project X. Total expenditure on this project had been $1,500,000, none of which had been capitalised in the financial statements. The product developed by Project X went on sale on 1 January 2009, and the product was a great success. The product ’s life cycle was only two years, so no further sales of the product are expected after 31 December 2010.

    Based on IAS38, all expenditures are not allowed to retrospective recognition. None of which had been capitalised in the financial statement. If project X was not capitalised, no amortization should be done, correct?

    I can’t understand why $750k needs to be amortized in NOPAT calculation. could you please help me?

    Thank you,
    Lily

    October 10, 2020 at 8:23 pm #588543
    Ken Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10650
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    EVA pays little heed to accounting standards. For example, R&D and marketing costs are added back for NOPAT whereas accounting standards would say they should be written off. Similarly, economic depreciation replaces conventional book depreciation.

    If R&D is capitalised for NOPAT, for consistency it should then be amortised over its estimated useful life.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Bank Reconciliations (b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • wubailin on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • SEARELE on Bank Reconciliations (b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • hasnaraw on Group SFP – Basic consolidation (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Aadhi69 on Groups – Other points – ACCA SBR

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in