Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › EVA example 1 Chapter 16
- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- June 4, 2016 at 12:55 pm #319320
Hi
1.
sorry, I feel a bit silly asking this question. I thought I did know how to adjust EVA re leases but I could not understand why we add $16 to CE but do not add them back to profits.
The information given on leases:
Value Co had non-capitalised leases valued at $16m in each of the years 2005 to 2007. The leases are not subject to amortisation.
What was already reflected in accounts? My understanding is leases were not on BS but were written off as expense. Then I should add it back to CE at the end of each year and add back to profit of the relevant year.
What does ‘not subject to amortisation’ mean? that they were not written off as expense in the relevant year? or $16m should not be written off?
why we do not add back $16m back to the profits?Could you please explain this treatment of leases step by step?
2. Non cash expenses are $20m in 2006 &2007. why don’t we add $20m to CE at the beginning of 2007?
Thank you
June 4, 2016 at 4:30 pm #319364EVA is being removed from the P4 syllabus, and so there is really no likelihood of it being asked in June.
Don’t worry about it 🙂June 5, 2016 at 7:38 pm #319674Excuse me, can you tell me what does it mean by “EVA”? Is this Economic Added Value in chapter 10 – valuation of a Type I acquisition?
Thanks a lot.June 6, 2016 at 7:51 am #319753Yes – EVA is economic value added.
June 6, 2016 at 8:31 am #319760Sir, what is the reason for the removal of EVA? Is it obsolete or unrealistic, or something else?
June 6, 2016 at 11:05 am #319796I don’t know the reason – I do not write the syllabus!
I guess maybe it is because it is examinable in Paper P5.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.