• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

September 2025 ACCA Exam results

Post comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for December 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Effect of drawing of inventory on PnL

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FA – FIA FFA › Effect of drawing of inventory on PnL

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 2, 2015 at 3:32 pm #264707
    accalmz
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 12
    • ☆

    Dear sir,

    I’ve learned that when traders makes drawing of inventories for personal use, the correct entry is Debit drawings and Credit Purchases. Given this, I think the impact on COGS is that it makes COGS smaller (since COGS = Beginning inventory + Purchases- Ending inventory), and this should translate into higher earnings, and higher equity, higher capital balance.
    At the same time, “debitting drawings” should result a smaller capital balance.
    These two seem to contradict with each other. Can you help to clarify? thanks

    Liming

    August 2, 2015 at 5:23 pm #264751
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54761
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I do not understand why you should think that they contradict!

    Imagine if the owner had instead taken cash from the business and used the cash to buy the goods personally (instead of having the company buy then and then take them himself).

    The business would have bought less, so the profit (and therefore the capital) would be higher. There would have been more drawings and therefore the capital would be lower.
    There is no contradiction at all – there is no reason whatsoever that it should affect the total owing to the owner.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hellokitty7 on FA Chapter 4 Questions Accruals and Prepayments
  • barbaraseweryn on Presentation of Financial Statements (IFRS18) – ACCA Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) lectures
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Basic group structures – Impairment – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on MA Chapter 5 Questions Ordering and Accounting for Inventory
  • John Moffat on FM Chapter 8 Questions – Relevant cash flows for DCF

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in