- This topic has 11 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by
.
- Posts
What do u mean by SC binds all English courts,but not itself
and CA Bound by ECJ, SC and itselfI dont understand the term itself in both cases?
SC is Supreme Court
CA is Court of Appeal
ECJ is European Court of Justice
(Are these not referred to in the notes immediately above?)
What is the difference between something binds something and not itself
and something bound by something and itself?
both the same meaning?sI dont understand your reply?
Imagine a vertical hierarchical structure with ECJ at the top, SC next underneath and CA below that.
When SC makes a decision, that decision is binding on all lower courts including AC but is not binding on judges hearing subsequent cases at SC level (so binds all English courts but not itself)
CA is bound by ECJ and by SC and by decisions made in previous cases by judges in cases heard by the Court of Appeal (so bound by ECJ, SC and itself)
Better?
Repudiatory breach refers to the breach of a term in a contract that is sufficiently serious to justify treating the contract as terminated.
A breach of a term that is a condition is an example of a repudiation breach
Ok?
okay understood its more of a vital term in the contract so sufficiently serious to justify treating the contract as terminated…
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.