- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by .
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › ACCA Forums › General ACCA Forums › diversifying risk
On page 310 of Paper P1 KAPLAN study text under the subtopic – Diversifying/spreading risk it is stated thus – ” Diversification is works best where returns from different businesses are negatively correlated ie (move in different ways) It will, however, still work as long as the correlation is less than +1.0.” It is the second part (it wil, however, still work as long as the correlation is less than +1.0) this requires further expalnation. Could someone help with some examples please
If the correlation of revenues from two products is +1.0 and product 1 revenues decline by 20% product 2 revenues will also decline by 20%. A portfolio invested 50% in both products will therefore decline by 20%.
If the correlation of the revenues from the two products is +0.5 and product 1 revenues decline by 20% product 2 revenues will decline by 10%. A portfolio invested 50% in both products will therefore decline by 15%.
Even though the correlation in both portfolios is positive the second portfolio is less risky than the first.
Check out your F2 notes!
@mikelittle said:
Check out your F2 notes!
Are you implying that my answer is not correct?
No – the comment was aimed at the original post asking about correlation and regression – topics from the F2 syllabus
