- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Which two of the following are reasons for dismissal which must be justified as fair
1)capability or qualifications of the employee
2)legal prohibitions relating to the employee
3)refusal of the employee to join a trade union
4)taking part in unofficial industrial actionA 1,2
B 1,3
C 2,3
D 2,4
Is taking part in unofficial industrial action not a fair reason for dismissal?In which of the following instances will a term NOT be incorporated into a business to business contract?
A. where a party signs the contract containing the term whether they have read it or not
B.where the term is an exclusion clause under the UCTA
C.where there is a course of dealing between the parties
D.where reasonable notice of the term is given but a contracting party remains unaware of its existenceIs the folowing statement true or false?
“In the situation where the court establishes that a plaintiff has contributed by their own actions to the damage that they have suffered, it is possible for the court to reduce the extent of the award of damages by 100%”why is this statement false?
Unofficial union action doesn’t need to be justified – it’s automatically fair. You need to be very careful when you read these questions!
Why don’t you like the answers given?
The second one looks to me like answer B
Answer 3, I don’t know. I have previously believed that it was not available for the Court to judge 100% blame but have subsequently read that 100% fault may be attributable to the injured party. Who says that the statement is false?
Strictly, the answer to the question is “Yes” where the question asks “Is the statement true or false?”
- The topic ‘dismissal’ is closed to new replies.