- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- The topic ‘Digunder (12/07)’ is closed to new replies.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Digunder (12/07)
Sir in a real option to delay, the exercise price is the investment amount we are delaying and the underlying value of the asset (Pa for the B-S formula) is the PV of the cash flows from the project being delayed.
This is the case normally and then we add/subtract the value of the option to/from the NPV of the project to get the value of the project.
However in this question we are not given the building costs for the housing development project but $4m it’s NPV (“Property sales less Building Costs”) and we are given the cost of acquiring the land $24m, for Pa we add up $24m and $4m and then for Pe again we use $24m, where’s the logic in this?
If the NPV is $4M, and the cost is $24M, then it must mean that the PV of the returns is $28M (to end up with an NPV of 28 – 4 = 24M).