The ratio in this case was that revocation can be communicated by a reliable source. The estate agent told Dickinson, “Dodds has sold the house to Allan.” Though, what if (in this case) revocation was not communicated; Dodds sold his house to someone else, so how can Dickinson enforce the contract, Dodds does not have possession of the land anymore.
No, so the Court would (probably ) make Dodds buy an equivalent house in a similar condition in a similar location ( no matter what the cost ) and sell it to Dickinson at the original price. But that would only happen if Dodds had paid for the option period from Monday to Friday ( I think there was an option period involved )
Author
Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy