- This topic has 15 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks ago by
.
- Posts
Section A was a complete disaster. Hardly any straightforward questions.
Section B as expected–not bad.
Section B was a typical AA paper
Section A though was the most bizarre set of MTQs I have ever seen
I thought it was decent paper but really didnt like the 14 marks for controls that were good with purchases and sales and NCA. Knew 3/4 controls but I have never seen the other ones pop up anywhere in my lectures/past a papers of last 3 years.Got 46% last time surely enough for a pass this time round
If it was the same paper that I had with executives/non executive section yes too many selections of 4 answers of true/false. One wrong you are screwed…
Section A had too many selections, unlike the mock papers. I thought I could get at least 20 marks from Section A, and then I’d only need another 10 marks from each questions in Section B then to pass! Well, it looks like it’s time to do some more revision for the March sitting 🙁
I only did Question 1 in Section A and move to Section B to complete th paper. Then came baq to Section A, with only 20 min for 2 Test Questions..i guess it was a good move, at least Section B had quite standard question so its safer to complete them.
Apart form a couple parts in section A having long questions, I thought a lot of them were really easy by process of elimination
The internal control question I got, was easy enough
Substantive procedures may have tripped me up
Was operating loss an indicator for going concern problem in that Sec A multiple chose question with many selections?
@deftoneseire07 /ANYONE who still remembers the sales and purchases controls on the last question. Was there a control on sequentially numbered documents either on sales or purchases controls?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.