• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

December 2018 question paper

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › December 2018 question paper

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 5, 2019 at 7:33 am #507623
    lachu910
    Member
    • Topics: 28
    • Replies: 38
    • ☆☆

    For future currency hedging alternative one

    the answer given is

    Futures
    Sell Swiss futures and use June futures contracts.
    No. of contracts = CHF12,300,000/125,000 = 98·4, say 98, hedging CHF12,250,000
    Remainder to be hedged on the forward market is CHF12,300,000 – CHF12,250,000 = CHF 50,000
    Receipt = CHF50,000 x 1·0358= $51,790
    Calculation of futures price
    Assume that basis reduces to zero at contract maturity in a linear fashion.
    Estimate from March and June futures contract rates.
    Predicted futures rate at the end of May = 1·0345 + ([1·0369 – 1·0345] x 2/3) = 1·0361
    Expected receipt = CHF12,250,000 x 1·0361 = $12,692,225.

    my question is for predicting the future rate for end of may why have we taken the “March and June future prices” and apportioned by 2/3??

    normally dont we take (Future price -spot price) * unexpired basis??

    my answer is 1·0292 + (1/7 x (1·0369 – 1·0292)=1.0303.. ie the unexpired basis is may – june one month /total no of months= 1/7

    also in the alternative two solution its given as

    1·0292 + (6/7 x (1·0369 – 1·0292)) why have they taken 6/7 as apportionment.

    in all my kaplan revision kit questions the solution is given as unexpired basis only.

    March 5, 2019 at 11:20 am #507708
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54671
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Given that ‘now’ is the 31st November, March futures finish in 4 months time and June futures finish in 7 months time (so 3 months between them).
    The transaction takes place on 31 May, which is in 6 months time (and is 2 months after the end of the March future).
    So the examiner has apportion between the two by taking the value of the March future and adding on 2/3 of the difference between the values of the June and March futures.

    Strictly, the better way of calculating the ‘lock-in rate’ is either to take the current spot rate and (here) add the expired basis (which is 6/7 of the difference between current spot and the June futures price) as you have typed above (which gives 1.0358); or alternatively, take the current futures price and subtract the unexpired basis (so 1.0369 – (1/7 x (1.0369 – 1.0292)) = 1.0358.

    When deciding whether to add or subtract the expired or unexpired basis (depending which way you do it), the ‘lock-in rate’ must always be somewhere between the current spot rate and the current futures price.

    I do explain this, and the reasoning behind it, in my free lectures on foreign exchange risk management.

    March 6, 2019 at 2:12 am #507890
    lachu910
    Member
    • Topics: 28
    • Replies: 38
    • ☆☆

    Wow..super!! thank you sir.. i realised i took the wrong future price.. thank you 🙂

    March 6, 2019 at 2:54 am #507897
    lachu910
    Member
    • Topics: 28
    • Replies: 38
    • ☆☆

    fort this question why have they not calculated profit/loss on futures market ..we usually take into consideration the prfit or loss on net outcome right??

    the answer given is
    Outcome
    $
    Futures 12,688,550(CHF12,250,000 x 1·0358 = $12,688,550)
    Remainder on forward market 51,790(50000* 1·0358)
    –––––––––––
    12,740,340

    March 6, 2019 at 5:59 am #507939
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54671
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Because they have used the ‘lock-in’ rate as I explained in my previous reply.

    I explain this, and the reasoning behind it, in my free lectures on foreign exchange risk management.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • zainab@24 on The capital asset pricing model (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • hana1992 on Foreign exchange risk management (2) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • John Moffat on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • ISABIRYEZA on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • ISABIRYEZA on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in