• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Dec 2010 Cosmetic co. – 3 constraints which two to solve

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Dec 2010 Cosmetic co. – 3 constraints which two to solve

  • This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 21, 2015 at 6:55 am #247506
    lakshmana iyer krishnan
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 46
    • ☆☆

    This has reference to the Dec 2010 cosmetics question. There are 3 constraints, two relating to raw material and third relating to labour. Examiner has solved the equiation using labour and material, but if you solve the equation using the material you get different values for x and y.
    1) silk – 3x + 2y = 5,000
    2) amino acid 1x + 0.5y = 1,600
    3) Labour 4x + 5y = 9,600

    If we solve 1 and 2 we get x = 400 and y = 1,400
    If we solve 1 and 3 we get x = 1,257.14 and y= 828.58.

    Accordingly answer values regarding optimum contribution and shadow price also will change.

    Is there any rule to follow in this regard? I don’t know whether I am wrong. But I have given the constraints correctly above.

    May 21, 2015 at 9:02 am #247545
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You have to draw the graph and then move out the contribution line to find which of the corners is the furthest away from the origin. Then you know which of the two constraints need to be solved to get the highest possible contribution.

    Incidentally, it is not x = 400 and y = 1400, it would be x = 1,400 and y = 400.

    I really do suggest that you watch the free lecture on linear programming.

    May 21, 2015 at 9:41 am #247555
    lakshmana iyer krishnan
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 46
    • ☆☆

    Thanks for the quick reply. Agree with the correction. I will watch the lectures.
    I thought solving the equation is easier and there will be some rule when 3 constraints are given. .
    Regards

    May 21, 2015 at 1:59 pm #247658
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No there is no rule – you can only decide by drawing the graph (and the examiner specifically asks for the graph).

    May 21, 2015 at 10:26 pm #247797
    Tazz
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    I’m confused with this question too.. after drawing the graph, in the answers, it says …

    Solve using iso-contribution line
    If y =800 and x = 0, then if C = 9x + 8y
    C = (8 x 800) = 6,400
    Therefore, if y = 0, 9x = 6,400
    Therefore x = 711·11

    Has this just used random number just to get the contribution line, right? It doesn’t matter which numbers I substitute for C? Because I used, C=7200, to get y=900 and x=800 which I then plotted on the graph.

    Also, I’m a little confused with the whole using the contribution line. Does this mean, if in the answer, the contribution line was a lot steeper, and if moved along, it intersected point “d”, we would solve the two equations which meet to form “d”?

    Thanks

    May 22, 2015 at 7:05 am #247839
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes to both questions (although it really would help you if you had watched the free lecture where I explain this in detail).

    It does not matter what value you choose for C when plotting the contribution line – it is the angle/slope of the line that we need, and it will be the same whatever value for C you choose.

    And yes, depending on the slope/angle of the line, if could be any one of the corners of the feasibly region that gives the maximum contribution.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • NirajNathani99 on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AKN1989 on Linear Programming – Maximum contribution – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Motsotase910 on Contingent Assets and Liabilities – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Kim Smith on ACCA F2 Key to success

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in