• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

BPP Black Friday sale! (28 Nov-1 Dec)

40% discount on all BPP books specially for OpenTuition students!
Get it here >>

Dali co sep/dec 2015

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Dali co sep/dec 2015

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 4, 2019 at 1:28 pm #507406
    cmanja82
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Hello
    I was going through this question and now I am confused.

    The company decided to revalue their manufacturing sites. In the suggested solution, it begins by saying that the decision to revalue creates SEVERAL RISKS, and it goes on to mention a number of them such as revaluation can be a subjective exercise, leading to inherent risk that the valuation may not be appropriate.
    It also says if an item of PPE is revalued all the items in that class should be revaluated.
    The model answer also talks about depreciation and it ends by talking about disclosure requirements of IAS 16, as separate risks or maybe I have misunderstood the answer.
    My question is, if the marking scheme says 2 marks for each risk evaluated and I wrote all those risks, will I be awarded only 2 marks or it will be 2 marks for each individual risk identified?

    March 4, 2019 at 2:45 pm #507428
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 137
    • Replies: 8385
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It’s all one risk area (“revaluation”) but the marks would not be capped at just 2 – but maybe 4, say. The marking scheme is a guide and you should interpret the mark allocations to be “generally up to …”. Note that in general it is the evaluation that is worth 2 marks (i.e. more than simply identification).

    March 4, 2019 at 4:02 pm #507455
    cmanja82
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Thank you so much for your quick response.

    March 4, 2019 at 4:09 pm #507459
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 137
    • Replies: 8385
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Dali co sep/dec 2015’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mrjonbain on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • unimkeabana on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • Mahrukh on Risk and uncertainty (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • John Moffat on Depreciation Example 4 – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • John Moffat on FM Chapter 9 Questions – Discounted cash flow – further aspects

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in