- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by
.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- Posts
Why they have taken additional cost of borrowing of 136000 why not the increased cost of borrowing 867000.
Also while calculating premium cost why is 8.1 why not 22.3+30.4=52.7
The third line of the question asks just about the extra cost of the borrowing.
When creating a collar, they pay a premium on the put options that they are buying, and the receive a premium from the person who is buying the call options from them. The whole point of creating a collar is to reduce the net premium payable – there is no other reason for creating it.
Have you watched my free lectures on collars?
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.