• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

cvp analysis

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › cvp analysis

  • This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 15, 2017 at 10:58 am #396102
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Betis Limited is considering changing the way it is structured by asking its employed staff to
    become freelance. Employees are currently paid a fixed salary of $240,000 per annum, but
    would instead be paid $200 per working day. On a typical working day, staff can produce
    40 units. Other fixed costs are $400,000 pa.
    The selling price of a unit is $60 and material costs are $20 per unit.

    What will be the effect of the change on the breakeven point of the business and the
    level of operating risk?

    – The answer is BE reduces by 4,571 units and operating risk goes down.
    – I have have obtained the answer for BE but my issue is that why and how why operating risk goes down.
    -In the answer it says, Operating risk reduces with less fixed costs in a business.
    – The business may obtained less fixed cost but it is also loosing contribution. Therefore the either the risk is neutral or the risks is high due to the fact that it is making less contribution.

    Could you please clarify this?

    Thanks.

    July 15, 2017 at 11:08 am #396112
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54695
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It is because the fixed costs are lower.

    The greater the fixed costs are, then the more the profit will go up and down in % terms if the sales go up and down, and therefore the more the risk.

    July 15, 2017 at 11:42 am #396129
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    I am a bit confused here. The business may have a reduction in fixed cost but at the same time it is also experiencing a reduction in contribution(form $40 to $35) .

    Could this decrease in contribution be a factor that in decreasing the overall profit? Because at the end, a reduction in contribution could be a factor that creates difficulties covering the fixed costs (although there has been a reduction in FC). Therefore this could be a risk!

    Could you please clarify?

    Thanks.

    July 15, 2017 at 5:40 pm #396180
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54695
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If profit in the future is certain, then there is no risk. If profit however might be higher or might be lower, then the more higher or lower it might be then the greater the risk.

    Suppose at the moment sales revenue is 100, variable costs are 40 and fixed costs are 20. Then the profit is 40.
    Suppose sales volume increases by 10%. The revenue will go up to 110, the variable costs will go up to 44, and the fixed costs will stay at 20. So the profit will go up from 40 to 46, which is an increase of 6/40 = 15%
    Suppose sales volume falls by 10%. The revenue will down to 90, the variable costs will go down to 36, and the fixed costs will stay at 20. So the profit will go down from 40 to 34, which is a fall of 6/40 = 15%.

    Suppose instead that at the moment revenue is 100, variable costs are 50 and fixed costs are 10. The current profit is therefore again 40.
    However repeat the workings above for sales volume increasing or decreasing by 10% and you will find that the profit increases or decreases by only 12.5% instead of 15%.

    The fact that it does up and down by a smaller % means things are less risky.

    July 17, 2017 at 5:05 am #396710
    nhatanh2197
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    How can we calculate the reduction in BE by 4571 units. fixed cost before the change is 640,000$ , what is the fixed cost after that?

    July 17, 2017 at 9:14 am #396893
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54695
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The answer is in the same revision kit as was the question.

    I do assume you have a Revision Kit? It is vital that you practice all the questions in your revision kit in order to be sure of passing the exam.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘cvp analysis’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • alexgriff10 on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • MidnightWolfie on Operating segments (IFRS 8) – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Dinomain on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in