Hi all,
A bit confused about covariance. ACCA technical article "the risk and return relationship" (published in May 2004) mentions that covariance is an absolute measure. To domenstrate this it's calulated giving answers 20, -20 and 0 for the three portfolios in the example used.
However BPP text book mentions something totally opposite. It states that covarinace is a relative measure and could be anywhere between -1 and +1.
Can someone advice whether covariance is absoulte or relative measure and how it's relates with correlation cofficient (if there is a formula please state).
A bit confused about covariance. ACCA technical article "the risk and return relationship" (published in May 2004) mentions that covariance is an absolute measure. To domenstrate this it's calulated giving answers 20, -20 and 0 for the three portfolios in the example used.
However BPP text book mentions something totally opposite. It states that covarinace is a relative measure and could be anywhere between -1 and +1.
Can someone advice whether covariance is absoulte or relative measure and how it's relates with correlation cofficient (if there is a formula please state).
