Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Cost of irredeemable debt
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 months ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- May 12, 2024 at 12:03 am #705267AnonymousInactive
- Topics: 2
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Hi there, I hope you’re well?
Looking at the chapter on the Cost of Capital I’ve attempted a question in the Kaplan Integrated workbook but my answer is not consistent with the answer at the end of the chapter – please could I have your help with this?
The question is:
A company has irredeemable loan notes in issue trading at $95 cum interest.
The coupon rate is 5% and the rate of corporation tax is 30%.
Calculate the pre-tax and post-tax cost of debt.My answer is:
Pre-tax cost of debt (aka return required by the investor):
I = 5% * $95 = $4.75
MV = $95 – $4.75 = $90.25
Pre-tax cost of debt (return required by the investor) = $4.75 / $90.25Post-tax cost of debt (aka the cost of debt to the investee):
I * (1 – T) = 5% * $95 * 0.7 = $3.33
MV = $95 – $4.75 = $90.25
Post-tax cost of debt (cost of debt to the investee): $3.33 / $90.25 = 3.68%Answer per Kaplan:
Ex interest MV = $95 – ($100 × 5%) = $90
Kd = I/MV
Kd = $5/$90 = 0.056 or 5.6%Kd(1 – T) = I (1 – T)/MV
Kd(1 – T) = ($5 × 0.7)/$90 = 0.039 or 3.9%I’ve naively assumed here that the cum interest market value is the nominal value of the loan note in the absence of all other information (using this to calculate my I value) and so can’t quite fathom the conclusion that the nominal value of the instrument is $100, hence calculating I as $5, rather than my $4.75.
I appreciate that in practice you cannot use the cum-interest value of a loan note as it’s nominal value for the basis of subtracting interest from to get the ex-interest value (since the coupon rate * nominal value would give the interest), but is there any information given in this question which would actually allow me to calculate the nominal value of $100?
Thanks.
May 12, 2024 at 9:48 am #705274Your calculation for the market value is incorrect. You used the same calculation as for the pre-tax cost of debt, but it should be based on the ex-interest market value ($90) provided in the answer per Kaplan.
Dividing the interest by the correct market value gives you the post-tax cost of debt as a percentage.The conclusion in the answer per Kaplan that the nominal value of the instrument is $100 is based on the assumption that the ex-interest market value is equal to the nominal value minus the interest. In this case, it is $100 – ($100 × 5%) = $90. This assumption allows for the calculation of the interest (I) as $5 and the subsequent determination of the pre-tax and post-tax cost of debt.
Therefore, the information given in the question does not explicitly provide the nominal value of $100, but it can be inferred based on the calculation of the ex-interest market value.
May 15, 2024 at 2:32 am #705397AnonymousInactive- Topics: 2
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Understood, thanks so much for confirming. I also rewatched some of the videos Kaplan supplied and they mention that in the absence of any nominal value being disclosed, assume it will be $100. Apologies for missing this!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.