• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

contract right act of 3rd party

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › contract right act of 3rd party

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 2, 2017 at 5:32 pm #419765
    humai
    Participant
    • Topics: 757
    • Replies: 248
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1) Sir, the display of goods for sale kit question which I asked you on 29th Nov, in that we shall consider that “there is a contract with Cat and the fact that Alvin has sold the car to Del means that Alvin will now probably have to find a similar car to sell to Cat for the agreed price”. Right?

    2) Sir, beeswick v beeswick case occurred in 1967, at that time executor can enforce the contract made by deceased. Contract rights of 3rd party act came in existence in 1999, whereby, 3rd party such as successor can enforce the contract if the contract was for his benefit and he was expressly identified in it. Sir , if beeswick v beeswick case would have occurred after 1999, then beeswick can enforce the contract in both capacity na i.e as executor and as a successor? because executor is already an exception of privity of contract, and after 1999 successor has also became an exception of privity of contract.

    December 2, 2017 at 5:49 pm #419772
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    My point is that you wouldn’t take action as BOTH executrix AND successor

    Pre 1999 the only course of action would be as executrix

    Post 1999 Mrs Beswick would not even begin to consider suing as executrix because the law has caught up with common sense (and Lord Denning’s innovative thinking) and would now sue as a successor

    But it would be as successor and NOT as executrix

    OK?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘contract right act of 3rd party’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mabdullah31 on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • MikeLittle on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • roksy on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • Fola94 on Presentation of financial statements – introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in