Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Contract
- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- March 1, 2016 at 12:46 pm #302818
Darby signed a contract (for an initial three years) in August 2009 with a company called Media Today to install a satellite dish and cabling system to a newly built group of residential apartments. Media Today will provide telephone and television services to the residents of the apartments via the satellite system and pay Darby $50,000 per annum commencing in December 2009. Work on the installation commenced on 1 September 2009 and the expenditure to 30 September 2009 was $58,000. The installation is expected to be completed by 31 October 2009. Previous experience with similar contracts indicates that Darby will make a total profit of $40,000 over the three years on this initial contract. The assistant correctly recorded the costs to 30 September 2009 of $58,000 as a non-current asset, but then wrote this amount down to $40,000 (the expected total profit) because he believed the asset to be impaired. The contract is not a finance lease. Ignore discounting.
Sir provided it was not mentioned that $58000 are correct to capitalised and treated as non-current assets, could we treat it as a contract asset where obligation is satisfied over time?
March 1, 2016 at 4:29 pm #302856Are you asking whether we could recognise both revenue and costs of $58,000 in the period to 30 September, 2009?
I believe that’s what you’re asking but, if I’m right, then the answer is “No”
We’ve not earned any revenue because we’ve not started providing a service yet
When we do start to receive our $50,000 per annum, then we shall start to amortise the $110,000 capitalised non-current asset and match it against the revenue
Ok?
March 1, 2016 at 5:07 pm #302876No, I meant if had they not mentioned about about capitalising 58000 could we show it as a contract asset? Just with the amount of cost to date 58000. Applying ifrs 15 here
March 1, 2016 at 6:11 pm #302899Can’t really show it as anything else, that is, it’s certainly not an expense (just following the matching concept)
March 1, 2016 at 6:14 pm #302901Hmm. Thank you.
March 1, 2016 at 6:31 pm #302908You’re welcome
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.