• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

construction contract (MCQ mock exam question)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › construction contract (MCQ mock exam question)

  • This topic has 12 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 4, 2015 at 1:51 am #287391
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    Q:
    on 1 jan, 2013 Agnes entered into a construction contract that is expected to last 36 months. The agreed price for the construction work was 20mil. As at 30 sept,2013 the costs incurred on the contract were $4mil and the estimated costs to complete the contract were $12mil. In addition to the above costs on 1 July, 2013 Agnes acquired for exclusive use on the contract an item of plant for $1mil. This plant has an estimated useful life of 2 years and will be scrapped at the end of that time.
    On 20 Sep,2013 Adriadne received a payment from the customer of $7mil which amount was equal to the progress billings to date. Adriadne calculates the stage of completion on construction contracts on the basis of progress billings as a proportion of the contract price

    What amount would be reported in Ariadne’s statement of financial position sa at 30 Sep 2013 for the amount due to/from the customer for the above contract?

    A:
    since % of completion is according to progress billing over contract price thus on 20 Sep 2013, the % completion = 7/20*100%= 35%

    w1 Rev Recognised $20mil * 35% = $7mil
    cost incurred on contract general = ($4mil+$12mil)*0.35=$ 5.6mil
    cost recognised specific = $1mil (3/24)=$0.125mil
    total cost recognised=5.6+0.125= $5.725mil

    profit reg=7-5.725=$1.275mil

    w2 cost incurred to date =$4mil
    profit recog= $1.275mil
    progress billing to date=$7mil
    amt due to/from customer = 4+1.275-7= ($1.725mil)

    thus $1,725,000 liability

    but there’s no option of this in answer, instead $ 1,600,000 liability is the correct answer, may i know why?

    December 4, 2015 at 8:50 am #287452
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23362
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Because costs incurred to date should include the 125 element of the specialised plant.

    That brings us to:

    Costs incurred to date (4,000 + 125) 4,125
    Attributable profit 1,275

    Sub-total 5,400
    Amounts invoiced 7,000
    Amount due to customer (1,600)

    OK?

    December 4, 2015 at 5:14 pm #287603
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    yes yes i see, i didn’t include the specific cost at the second part of the question

    December 4, 2015 at 5:39 pm #287616
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23362
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    What confused me were all these women!

    “Agnes entered into a construction contract ”

    “Adriadne received a payment”

    “Ariadne’s statement of financial position”

    December 4, 2015 at 5:44 pm #287617
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    another question
    in a construction that is 80% complete, with following info
    contract price $2mil
    cost incurred to date $1600,000 includes $50,000 specific cost
    estimate cost to complete $550,000

    what is cost recognised?
    answer says $1750,000

    i thought is ((1600,000-50000)+550,000)*0.8 + 50,000 = 1730,000?

    December 4, 2015 at 5:49 pm #287618
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23362
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    150,000 is the forecast loss

    1,600,000 is the revenue recognised

    Therefore costs recognised must be 1,750,000

    LOOK AT THE COURSE NOTES!!!!

    December 4, 2015 at 5:54 pm #287621
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    sorry Mike, how do you get the 150,000 forecast lost?

    December 4, 2015 at 5:55 pm #287623
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    nvm i got it. my brain need to spin again

    December 4, 2015 at 5:57 pm #287625
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    i meant i know how 150,000 come from but i not quite understand it.

    your lecture say

    cost recognised is general (cost incurred to date + estimate cost of completion) * % of completion
    + specific cost related to that period 100%

    thus i use the calculation and reach 1730,000

    why this time round we use the forecast total lost (1600000+550000)-full contract price?

    December 4, 2015 at 6:05 pm #287626
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    we use the forecast method when there’s a lost recognised

    or else stick to your formula right?

    i think this make sense as we need to recognised the lost in full to have a true and fair view (reduce penumbral area of divergence possibilities)

    December 4, 2015 at 8:08 pm #287648
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23362
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    LOOK AT THE COURSE NOTES!!!!

    It’s all explained in there as well as in the lectures

    LOOK AT THE COURSE NOTES!!!!

    December 5, 2015 at 5:02 am #287713
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    Found it , last 3 Min of ur first construction contract lecture. Yea I missed it. Thanks for your patience haha

    December 5, 2015 at 8:26 am #287738
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23362
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The lectures are recorded in a genuine class room environment. Students listen or, if they switch off, they may miss important points.

    It’s no point having a lecture and failing to pay attention for the entire period!

    The students on the courses were 100% not natural English speakers and lectures lasted 90 minutes.

    If they can do it ……. so can you

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 17 – The nature of communication – Questions
  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 14 – How people learn – Questions
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in