• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

consolidation statement of financial position

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › consolidation statement of financial position

  • This topic has 36 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 37 total)
1 2 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 14, 2016 at 5:18 am #343239
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Example 10 Robertas and ingrida
    chapter 7 topic
    “mid year acquisitions example”
    When you were drafting consolidated statement of financial position

    Q1) Why you didn’t write any value under share premium?

    Q2) why negative goodwill of $6000 was added to (working 3) though we made profit for the year 2009, it should have been deducted why it is been added?

    October 15, 2016 at 8:42 pm #343375
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Share premium arises on the issue of shares

    Has the subsidiary issued any shares post acquisition?

    Negative goodwill is added to reserves at the earliest opportunity – in this case it’s the year end financial statements that we are asked to prepare. This is not an impairment of goodwill – that only happens when goodwill is positive

    Effectively we have made a bargain purchase – a “profit” on the acquisition of Ingrid

    Better?

    October 16, 2016 at 5:05 am #343388
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Yeah
    Thanks

    October 16, 2016 at 6:18 am #343389
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Chapter 8 “TRADING TRANSACTION”
    Example 1
    Working as per the notes given below example 1
    Note
    1) there was cash in transit of $30000 from Dovile to jurate at the year end.

    My working:

    In accounts of jurate
    DR Cash $30000
    Cr receivables $30000

    On the other hand
    In accounts of Dovile
    Dr accounts payable $30000
    Cr cash $30000

    Note ( 2)
    Goods despatched by jurate to Dovile before the year end with the related invoices to the value of $10000 were not received by Dovile until 4th January 2010. The orginal cost of the goods was $10000.

    In accounts of jurate
    Dr Receivable $10000
    Cr inventory $10000

    On the other hand
    In accounts of Dovile
    Dr inventory $30000
    Cr payables $30000

    My question is
    Q1) In note 1 adjustments
    why we didn’t adjust the affect to the Dovile’s accounts.

    Q2) IN note 2 adjustments
    Why we didn’t adjust the affect to the jurate’s accounts.

    October 16, 2016 at 11:59 am #343416
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1) there was cash in transit of $30000 from Dovile to jurate at the year end.

    If Dovile has sent it, then Dovile must have recorded the payment

    Similarly, if Jurate has despatched the goods, then Jurate must have recorded the transaction (in Receivables and REVENUE – not in inventory)

    October 17, 2016 at 3:59 am #343750
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Ok thanks

    October 17, 2016 at 7:30 am #343897
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Example 2 chapter 8
    Petras and signe
    In that question
    working 3
    Consolidated retained earnings
    Pup is deducted from per question’s retained earnings if the example would have been about a sale, outside the group then, how we would treat unrealized profit.
    Secondly, why we didn’t reduce inventory by $48000, though, we should have recorded at cost
    Sir I am getting confused

    October 17, 2016 at 7:50 am #343908
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “if the example would have been about a sale, outside the group then, how we would treat unrealized profit.”

    Is that a silly question?

    If it’s a sale outside the group, the profit IS realised!

    “why we didn’t reduce inventory by $48000, though, we should have recorded at cost”

    Why would we eliminate the inventory?

    October 17, 2016 at 9:51 am #344093
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Oh yeah oops it was a silly question
    Sorry
    And thanks

    October 17, 2016 at 4:58 pm #344364
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

    October 18, 2016 at 7:26 am #344521
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Chapter 8
    Example 2 petras and signe
    Note # 2
    I don’t know whether my question is silly or not, but it just clicked into my head.
    why we didnt make any change to receivables,Though, receivables increased by $60,000.

    October 18, 2016 at 7:35 am #344528
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Before I answer, may I ask you to check the line of type at the very end of the question … underneath the line that says “Total equity and liabilities 810 300”

    October 18, 2016 at 8:06 am #344548
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    “Now cancel 60000 receivable from dovile against 60000 payable to jurate”

    Ohhhh you mean $60000 receivable from signe has been cancelled against $60000 payables to petras
    Am I correct?

    October 18, 2016 at 11:58 am #344637
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – that was the point of that line! The $60,000 included within Receivables should now be cancelled against the $60,000 included within Payables

    OK?

    October 19, 2016 at 1:47 pm #344976
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Ok 🙂

    October 19, 2016 at 2:23 pm #344983
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Witch acquired 70% of the 200,000 equity shares of wizard, it’s only subsidary, on 1 April 20×8 when the retained earnings of wizard were $450,000. The carrying amounts of wizard’s net assets at the date of acquisition were equal to their fair values apart from a building which had a carrying amount of $600000 and a fair value of $850,000. The remaining useful life of the building at the acquisition date was 40 years.
    Witch measures non controlling interest at fair value based on share price. The market value of wizard shares at the date of acquisition was $1.75.
    At 31 March 20×9 the retained earnings of wizard were $750000. At what amount should the non controlling interest appear in the consolidated statement of financial position of witch at 31 March 20×9?
    Can you please solve this question as my answer is wrong

    October 19, 2016 at 2:51 pm #344995
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Show me your answer and I’ll tell you where you’ve gone wrong

    However … did you follow the illustration on page 53 in the course notes to show the value of the nci as at date of acquisition?

    And did you understand the basis of the calculation of the nci for the statement of financial position (page 36, working 4)?

    Tell me your answer and I’ll tell you what you have done that is incorrect

    October 19, 2016 at 7:12 pm #345040
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    NCI= 200,000 shares *30% × 1.75 =$105,000

    W3
    Consolidated retained earnings
    Wizard
    Per question $750000
    Fair value $585000 (600000/40yrs
    = $15000 -600000)
    —————–
    $1335000
    Pre acquisition ($450,000)
    Fair value ($600,000)
    ——————
    Post acquisition $285000
    30%
    W4
    NCI (30%)

    Value of NCI $105000
    +
    Fair value of post retained earnings $85500

    Therefore value of NCI = 105000 + 85500 =$190500

    October 19, 2016 at 7:26 pm #345044
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I agree $105,000

    I calculate post acquisition as being ($750,000 – $ 6,250) – $450,000 = $293,750 and 30% of that is $88,125

    So total nci is $193,125

    Is that correct?

    $6,250 is 1/40 of the fair value difference when compared with carrying value (1/40 x ($850,000 – $600,000)) = 1/40 x $250,000 = $6,250

    Better?

    October 19, 2016 at 7:53 pm #345051
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Yup you answer is correct
    Thank you

    October 19, 2016 at 8:09 pm #345053
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    On 1 June 20×1 premier acquired 80% of the equity share capital of Sandford. At the date of acquisition the fair values of Sandford’s net assets were equal to their carrying amounts with the exception of its property. This had a fair value of $1.2 million below its carrying amount. The property had a remaining useful life of eight years.
    What effect will any adjustment required in respect of the property have on group retained earnings at 30 September 20×1?
    $( ) increase/ decrease

    My working
    (W3) consolidated retained earnings

    Per question $1150000 (1200000/8yrs ×4/12) = $50000-1200000 = $1150000.

    Pre acquistion ( $1200000)
    ———————
    Post acquisition $50,000
    Therefore increase by $50,000

    But real answer is $40,000

    October 19, 2016 at 8:28 pm #345057
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Q2) on 1 August 20×7 patronic purchased 18 million of the 24 million $1 equity shares of sardonic. The acquisition was through a share exchange of two shares in patronic for every three shares in sardonic. The market price of a share in patronic at 1.08.20×7 was $5.75. Patronic will also pay in cash on 31 July 20×9 (two years after acquisition) $2.42 per acquired share of sardonic. Patronic’s cost of capital is 10% per annum.
    What is the amount of the consideration attributable to patronic for the acquisition of sardonic?

    My answer
    18m *2/3 = 12000000
    Share capital(12000000*1) $12000000
    Share premium ($1-$5.75)* 12000000
    = $57000000
    Present value = $50400000
    12000000*1/1.10 =10909091
    12000000*1/1.10^2 =9917355
    —————
    20826446 *$2.42
    = $50400000
    Total answer is share capital + share premium+ present value =$ 119400000
    But correct answer is $105M

    October 19, 2016 at 8:38 pm #345059
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    @unaiza said:
    On 1 June 20×1 premier acquired 80% of the equity share capital of Sandford. At the date of acquisition the fair values of Sandford’s net assets were equal to their carrying amounts with the exception of its property. This had a fair value of $1.2 million below its carrying amount. The property had a remaining useful life of eight years.
    What effect will any adjustment required in respect of the property have on group retained earnings at 30 September 20×1?
    $( ) increase/ decrease

    My working
    (W3) consolidated retained earnings

    Per question $1150000 (1200000/8yrs ×4/12) = $50000-1200000 = $1150000.

    Pre acquistion ( $1200000)
    ———————
    Post acquisition $50,000
    Therefore increase by $50,000

    But correct answer is $40,000

    October 20, 2016 at 8:50 am #345128
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “But real answer is $40,000”

    Because we only own 80%

    October 20, 2016 at 8:54 am #345129
    unaiza
    Participant
    • Topics: 37
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Q3) Pamela acquired 80% of the share capital of Samantha on 1/1/20×1. Part of the purchase consideration was to pay additional cash on 1/1/20×4 of $200,000. The applicable cost of capital is 10%..
    What will the deferred consideration liablity be at 31/12/20×2?
    A) $150,262
    B) $165,288
    C) $200,000
    D) $ 181,817
    Correct answer is D) $181,817

    My working

    $200000 *1/1.10^2 = $165289
    I.E : ( B)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 37 total)
1 2 →
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • beata443c on Civil Law, Common Law, Criminal Law – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • heary123@ on Group SFP – Unrealised profit and inventory in transit – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • heary123@ on Group SFP – Unrealised profit and inventory in transit – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on PM Chapter 15 Questions Financial Performance Measurement
  • Ken Garrett on Governance – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in