• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Consolidation – Simple Group (Example 1)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Consolidation – Simple Group (Example 1)

  • This topic has 11 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 20, 2015 at 2:44 pm #272563
    Joanna
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆☆

    At the date of acquisition, some of Danute’s inventory had a fair value $12,000 in excess of its carrying value. All of this inventory had been sold before the year end.

    How come the answer for inventory is ($100,000 + $50,000 – $5850 = $144,150) and not ($100,000+$50,000 + $12,000 – $5850 = $156,150)? Why wasn’t the fair value adjustment being included inside?

    September 20, 2015 at 9:11 pm #272589
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23333
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Inventory is an asset that is valued at a moment in time (the date of the statement of financial position) Ask yourself, how much of those $12,000 goods were in inventory?

    Need I say more?

    September 21, 2015 at 4:52 pm #272659
    Joanna
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆☆

    Hi Mike,

    I still do not quite understand as to why there isn’t a need to include the FV adjustment for inventory? Is it because inventory is always valued as of year end and thus the FV adjustment had been accounted for?

    sorry for the trouble.

    Thanks

    September 22, 2015 at 10:03 am #272733
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23333
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Joanna, transport yourself mentally into the warehouses of Ausra and Danute. Stand there in the middle of those warehouses and look around. What can you see?

    Loads of inventory in the Ausra warehouse – about $100,000 worth.

    And then loads more in the Danute warehouse – another $50,000 worth.

    And you also, following enquiry, discover that there’s another element of inventory in transit between the group entities – another $5,850

    Now, what I’m going to ask you to do is look around and thoroughly search the premises of both Ausra and Danute and tell me when you have found that inventory that was $12,000 undervalued two years ago

    Let me know when you have found it and we’ll go on further with your query (if necessary)

    September 22, 2015 at 4:49 pm #272803
    Joanna
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆☆

    Hi Mike,

    Is it because inventories are valued at lower of cost and NRV. Therefore, it is not possible to revalue the inventory upwards? Hence, there will not be any upward adjustment for inventories?

    Thanks and sorry for the trouble.

    September 22, 2015 at 6:33 pm #272817
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23333
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No, Joanna, that has nothing at all to do with it!

    When you were looking, as I asked you, how much of that $12,000 inventory did you see?

    September 23, 2015 at 12:35 pm #273237
    Joanna
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆☆

    Hi Mike,

    I will be able to see inventory but all the inventory will be looking identical. So it is not possible to determine which inventory had been undervalued?

    Thanks!

    September 23, 2015 at 3:57 pm #273292
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23333
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    But doesn’t the question say specifically that that $12,000 has been sold? So how can you see it now in the warehouse?

    September 24, 2015 at 5:35 pm #273422
    Joanna
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆☆

    Thanks Mike

    September 24, 2015 at 8:32 pm #273432
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23333
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Joanna, are you sure that you understand the inventory issue?

    September 25, 2015 at 3:37 am #273461
    Joanna
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆☆

    Since the inventory had already been sold off, it will not reflect on the financial statements. Therefore, it will not affect the valuation of inventory. Is my understanding correct?

    September 25, 2015 at 7:44 am #273483
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23333
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    That’s better!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Cost Classification and Behaviour part 1 – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)/you
  • xtal2000 on Chapter 13 Capital Gains Tax – Individuals – Reliefs TX-UK FA2023
  • bhumichaudhary on Cost Classification and Behaviour part 1 – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)/you
  • stvincent89 on ACCA P4 Question 1 December 2014 part 3
  • lara01 on Problems with registration

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in