• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Consolidation

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Consolidation

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 8, 2017 at 10:21 am #385325
    rihaam
    Member
    • Topics: 53
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆☆

    Premier (parent) had a trade payables owing to Sanford (subsidiary) of $ 350000 as at 30 sep 2010.This did not agree with the corresponding recievable in Sanford’s books due to a $130000 payment made to Sanford , which Sanford has not yet recorded.

    Here, Sanfords’s receivables has to be decreased by $350000 and $130000
    in consolidation. Here I assumed that the receivables have not been derecognised as a result of payment.
    But in the solution $130000 has been and then $130000 and $ 350000 is subtracted.Can you please help me to figure out the reason for this.

    May 8, 2017 at 11:56 am #385340
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23368
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    When you say that “$130,000 has been” I can only assume that, in Sandford’s records, the cash from Premier has been accelerated into Sandford and the entry Dr Cash $130,000 Cr Premier $130,000 has been put through

    That being so, we now need to cancel $350,000 from both the combined receivables and the combined payables

    So in the answer it probably shows:

    $xxx,xxx + $480,000 – $130,000 – $350,000

    Does that make sense to you now?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Consolidation’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • aksemurtaza5 on Accounting for Limited Companies –  The statement of Profit and Loss – ACCA (FA) lectures
  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 3 – Advantages of, and problems with – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • dubsforbill on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • saaranitinchandratre on Activity Based Costing part 3 – Advantages of, and problems with – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • adam on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in