• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Consolidated statement— intragroup trading

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Consolidated statement— intragroup trading

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 18, 2013 at 12:06 pm #132710
    locnguyen2210
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Suppose :
    S Co. had recorded sale of $5000 to P Co.
    S had purchased these goods from outside supplier at cost of $3000, and half of them still remains in P Co. inventory at the end of yead.
    We also have Cost of sale for both company as P : $30m and S: $ 20m

    In solution: Consolidated statement of P/L
    COS = 30+20-5+1 =46

    I dont get why it has ( -5+1 ) ???
    Anyone can explain it. plz

    June 18, 2013 at 1:52 pm #132753
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The 5 deduction is simply to eliminate the intra-group transaction (also cancelled from combined revenue)

    The addition of 1 is to eliminate the unrealised profit which S Co has recognised when it made the sale to P Co. Without the adjustment, S’s profits include the 2 profit which it recognised when it made the sale to P Co. But you cannot make a profit by selling to “yourself” (in a group situation, we treat the companies within the group as though they were a single combined entity)

    Because P Co has sold half the goods to the outside World, so far as the group is concerned, the profit on the half of the goods sold outside HAS been achieved. But the goods remaining in P’s inventory (at cost to P of $2,500) INCLUDE the profit element charged by S on sale to P and it’s that profit element which we need to adjust for.

    IF your question is “Why do we ADD the 1 to cost of sales?” it’s because, by adding to cost of sales, we are reducing the gross profit – costs are being increased by the 1 so profit is therefore reduced by 1

    Is that clear?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • alexgriff10 on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • MidnightWolfie on Operating segments (IFRS 8) – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Dinomain on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • hoangacca on Cost Classification and Behaviour part 2 – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in