• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Confusion within an ACCA Article

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA APM Exams › Confusion within an ACCA Article

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Ken Garrett.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 17, 2016 at 8:46 am #344001
    bilalahmad99
    Member
    • Topics: 48
    • Replies: 53
    • ☆☆

    Hello Ken,
    Hope you are doing well.
    In your article ”common mistakes and misconception in the use of numerical data used for performance measurement”

    in the middle of this article talking about theoretical symmetrical distribution of thr annual income of a population, how have u reached the arithmetic mean of this distribution 55400, while the it should be 13750/250=250
    second question is about the same topic heading that:
    how come arithmetic mean including Gutenburg would be around 55380 if salary bands are reduced by 5% ?
    Basically I am struggling to cope with this whole thing, just this annual income example within this article.
    Could you help in clarifying these points.
    I do apologise in advance if I am not clear enough to you in making my points.

    Thanks,

    October 17, 2016 at 11:24 am #344177
    Ken Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10598
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The salary mean is calculated by using ?fx/?f:

    (10 x 15 + 20 + 25 + …….10 x 95)/(10 + 20 + ….10)

    Similarly when Gutenburg is included, the number of people remain the same, salaries go down by 5% and Gutenburg’s details are added (an addidional salary of 10m and one extra person to bring the total of the people to 251).

    Don’t fret too much about this topic.

    October 17, 2016 at 12:28 pm #344217
    bilalahmad99
    Member
    • Topics: 48
    • Replies: 53
    • ☆☆

    Thanks for your reply.
    I still can’t calculate the right salary mean as contained there in the artcile I am getting 55’000 (13750/250).

    October 18, 2016 at 8:04 am #344546
    Ken Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10598
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    ??? 55,000 is what the article says.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • ahmad7861 on IAS 16 – Revaluation decrease – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Budgeting part 4 – Cash Budgets – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • John Moffat on Forward contracts – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • finance123 on Budgeting part 4 – Cash Budgets – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • actionj on Forward contracts – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in