• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Coeden and wacc

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Coeden and wacc

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 22, 2015 at 8:31 am #247884
    mr n
    Member
    • Topics: 30
    • Replies: 59
    • ☆☆

    hi john, hope u r fine.

    coden question, part a on the comment part, i get it it says as debt reduces..gearing reduces and cost of equity will also reduce as a result…but why does wacc increase?

    and why does wacc increase generally speaking..?

    May 22, 2015 at 11:13 am #247918
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54701
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This is really due to Modigliani and Miller.

    They proved that as gearing increases, the WACC will reduce. The reason is that debt is tax allowable which makes debt borrowing cheaper. So even though the cost of equity will increase (due to higher gearing), the tax advantage on the extra debt more than covers the higher cost of equity and so the WACC falls.

    The comment above is the same thing in reverse – i.e. gearing falling.

    For a fuller explanation you really need to watch the Paper F9 lectures on Modigliani and Miller.

    May 22, 2015 at 2:29 pm #247959
    mr n
    Member
    • Topics: 30
    • Replies: 59
    • ☆☆

    so in coeden case , the tax shielding on profits effect is substantially less as a result of reduction in debt amount and is outweighed by the higher cost equity leading to an increase in wacc? is that rgt?

    May 22, 2015 at 2:40 pm #247963
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54701
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Correct 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • askar.turganbayev@gmail.com on AA Chapter 2 Questions
  • RashidMh on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hsaini on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in