- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- Posts
Dangerous due to contamination of chemical good, may be defective. Headford audit client did not recall the product.
If management refuses to disclose then what will the auditors do? As auditors should not disclose info to public unless there is a legal right or duty to do so.
If remote- defective gds then would auditors disclose?
If severe then auditors should disclose to relevant authority if there is one or those charged with governance or audit committee. Is this correct?
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.