- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- The topic ‘CLARITY REQUIRED ON VARIANCE’ is closed to new replies.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › CLARITY REQUIRED ON VARIANCE
Hi John,
Just for clarity, do the examiner penalise for writing in short from. E.g where i am met to compute a variance e.g MUPV – material useage planning variance i then write RM4AP – SM4AP * AMU. Rather than Revised Material for actual production – Standard Material for actual production * Actual Material used. Would the examiner penalise for this? I have gone through some reports and can’t exactly see comments in response to this.This is my way of recalling the formula and this is what i did in the exam hall. Worried i might lose some marks.
Also for one of the variance computed i got a favourable variance, but because of the way i postitioned formula i got “- 3876 then i wrote Favourable variance in front” just wondering if i would be penalised for this as well. As the – sign and the favourable comment contradict each other.
In Section C then provided the marker can understand your workings you get the marks (and the marker can see any formulas you have used within the spreadsheet).