• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Chrysos Co Mar/Jun 17

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Chrysos Co Mar/Jun 17

  • This topic has 8 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 2, 2017 at 9:58 am #404990
    nickstar
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Sir,

    I am puzzled as to why interest is not included in the calculation of the cash flows for the MBO of the machinery parts manufacturing business unit?

    September 2, 2017 at 10:08 am #404994
    nickstar
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Also why is it that the estimated value of the cash flows is not discounted if the cash flow is from the end of year 1? Shouldn’t the value be {[(435×1.08)/0.1]x0.909} ?

    September 2, 2017 at 10:31 am #404999
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54675
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    We never subtract interest in arriving at the net cash flows when we are discounting at the cost of capital. (The calculation of the WACC will have included the cost of debt, and therefore the interest is accounted for in the discounting – to show it as a cash flow as well would be accounting for it twice 🙂 )

    The first flow is indeed at the end of the first year, which is one year from now – i.e. time 1.
    so the flows are from 1 to infinity, and multiplying by 1/r discounts a perpetuity starting in 1 years time – we do not need to discount for another year (that would only be relevant if the first flow was in 2 years time).

    September 2, 2017 at 10:51 am #405001
    nickstar
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Thank you for your prompt reply sir I understand better now

    September 2, 2017 at 10:52 am #405002
    nickstar
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 23
    • ☆

    Just to clarify, you said 1/r, by that do you mean 1/required return?

    September 3, 2017 at 8:26 am #405099
    parisnaaa
    Member
    • Topics: 32
    • Replies: 92
    • ☆☆

    Hi John. I didn’t understand the appendix 4: value created for vco.
    1)Vco has paid $400m for 600m shares so its share proportion will increase but how is vco equity share proportion increased to 40%?

    2)50% * 18458. Why 50% is multiplied?

    3)why is the value of unsecured bonds taken into account when it has been replaced by 600m shares?

    4) why only vco value of equity taken into account and not other shareholders?

    September 3, 2017 at 1:21 pm #405156
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54675
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    nickstar: ‘r’ is whatever interest rate we are discounting at, which in this case is the WACC.

    September 3, 2017 at 1:51 pm #405162
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54675
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1 Total shares will go up to 1,800 + 600 = 2,400.
    VCO’s shares go up to (20% x 1800) + 600 = 960
    960/2400 = 40%

    2 18458 is the value of their 40% holding. They already held 20% and so the extra is 20/40 (or 50%) x 18458

    3. It is the amount foregone (i.e. ‘lost’) and so reduces the net gain

    4. Because it is looking at the value created for the VCO’s

    September 3, 2017 at 1:52 pm #405163
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54675
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1 Total shares will go up to 1,800 + 600 = 2,400.
    VCO’s shares go up to (20% x 1800) + 600 = 960
    960/2400 = 40%

    2 18458 is the value of their 40% holding. They already held 20% and so the extra is 20/40 (or 50%) x 18458

    3. It is the amount foregone (i.e. ‘lost’) and so reduces the net gain

    4. Because it is looking at the value created for the VCO’s

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • The topic ‘Chrysos Co Mar/Jun 17’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Goodness on Accruals and Prepayments (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • mrjonbain on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Ejueyitsi-Toju on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • sadik.sadka on How to make the best use of OpenTuition
  • SONIC916 on Lessee accounting – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in