- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
.
- Posts
Hi
I need to ask 1 question that where examiner ask to identify and explain control deficiencies from the given scenario, so as far as explanation/impact is concerned do we have to write just 1 point in explanation/impact or do we have to write 2-3 points?
Like in Cherry blossom question , there was a deficiency that “Orders are being placed for goods without the inventory levels being checked first”
For its explanation/impact examiner wrote that “This could result in goods being ordered which are not required, leading to unnecessary cash outflows.”
“In addition, as the company does not currently monitor
inventory levels, it could experience stock-outs resulting in the
company being unable to meet customer orders.”So do we have to write both the above points while explaining or are we required to write just 1 point? Given that we know according to examiner marking scheme that identification and explanation of 1 deficiency carries 1 mark
I recommend that you practice questions since the current exam format was introduced (i.e. since September 2016). You will then be able to read the current examiner’s reports alongside the model answers to guide you in this.
This is ridiculous.
The tutor has already told you that we do not provide this sort of answering/marking advice – these forums exist to give help on anything that students are unclear about in our free lectures.
Keep changing your name (you are already using at least 5 different names) is simply abusing our service, and any future posts from you will be deleted.
- The topic ‘Cherry blossom J15’ is closed to new replies.