- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
- Posts
Hi ,
In Chakula MJ 21 , c ii) the impact on Lahla Co’s capital structure under each payment method
we deduct the cash consideration payable to the acquiree’s shareholders to arrive at the value of equity.But in Louieed co, we do not do so while calculating the impact on gearing.
May i know why?
The difference in treatment is due to the fact that the PE ratio will change depending on how the purchase is paid for.
In Chakula we have used the PE given in the question to get the total value of the equity (assuming that there is no cash payment). There is a cash payment and therefore the value of the equity will fall (as will the PE ratio afterwards).
In Louieed, the PE ratio has been calculated and takes into account the cash payment (and is lower as a result).
(Just as a general point (assuming that you are taking the exam this session) then although obviously you are wanting to sort everything out (and so do keep asking), at the same time when you actually come to take the exam just remember that you are aiming to score at least 50% on each question in order to pass. Make sure in the exam that you do not let yourself get bogged down on anything. Show your workings clearly, state any assumptions, and even if you end up with the wrong answer you will still get marks for making it is clear what you are trying to do. Make sure you do something (however little) for every part of each question, and always make relevant comments on whatever answers you get (even if the answer is wrong) and will surely get the 50% needed 🙂 :-))
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.