- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 months ago by
Stephen Widberg.
Stephen Widberg.Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
Posts
-
a7mdsuliman
- Topics: 6
- Replies: 6
- ☆
Hi,
chapter 7 example 3 :- why did we ignore the change if PPE, for some reason I believe because the information given wasn’t enough (Depreciation on both parent and sub) is that correct ?
Regards,
Ahmed
Stephen Widberg
- Topics: 10
- Replies: 2523
- ☆☆☆☆☆
Yes. Not really enough information – we would need to be told group depreciation and whether or not there were any disposals.
If we ignore depreciation and disposals the ‘purchase of PPE’ would be 15. ((520-490)-15)
🙂
a7mdsuliman
Stephen WidbergViewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.