• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

CGU

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › CGU

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 9, 2018 at 1:54 pm #450891
    iyamu
    Participant
    • Topics: 286
    • Replies: 171
    • ☆☆☆

    From Kaplan Exam kit!!

    A division of a company has the following balances in its FS :
    Goodwill = $700,000
    Plant = $950,000
    Building = $2,300,000
    Intangibles = $800,000
    Other net asset = $430,000

    Following a period of losses, the recoverable amount of the division is deemed to be $4 million. A recent valuation of the building showed that the building has a market value of $2.5 million. The other net assets are at their recoverable amount. The company uses the cost model for valuing building , plant and equipment.

    To the nearest thousand, what is the balance on plant following the impairment review ?

    Solution :

    Total cv = $5,180,000
    Recoverable amount = $4 million
    Impairment loss = $1,180,000

    Goodwill eliminated = 1,180,000 – 700,000 = $480,000

    Pro rate plant and intangibles to allocate impairment to plant only since other net asset are at their recoverable figure .

    950,000+800,000 = $1750,000

    Plant = 950,000/1,750,000 = 261,000
    Carrying amount = 950,000 – 261,000 = $689,000

    My question, why was the building excluded from the total figure when pro rated is used in allocating the impairment loss across plant , building and intangible assets ?

    That is, 950,000 + 800,000 + 2,300,000 = $4,050,000. Then we can apply pro rate to calculate each balances

    I was thinking it was part of the Cash generating unit which was added together to get $5,180,000.

    May 9, 2018 at 4:46 pm #450903
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23333
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “My question, why was the building excluded from the total figure when pro rated is used in allocating the impairment loss across plant , building and intangible assets ?”

    Because, if we include the building in the pro rata calculation, it means that we shall be reducing it below its recoverable amount (the higher of value in use compared with net selling price) … and you know already that we are not allowed to do that!

    OK?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘CGU’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • nibbledribble on CIMA BA3 Depreciation (part d)
  • omostofi86 on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • Anonymously on Chapter 4 – Tax Adjusted Trading Profit – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • John Moffat on Cost Classification and Behaviour part 1 – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)/you
  • xtal2000 on Chapter 13 Capital Gains Tax – Individuals – Reliefs TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in