- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
Ken Garrett.
Ken Garrett.-
Posts
-
mkfatima
- Topics: 17
- Replies: 3
- ☆
Hi sir,
I need your assistance to clear my concept.
In centerilization, there is good cordination between staff and not fast decision.strategic level ,procedures are planned and followed.In decenterilization there is quick decision making and no cordination between staff.
Is this correct?Ken Garrett
- Topics: 10
- Replies: 9299
- ☆☆☆☆☆
Broadly, yes.
In pure centralisation all decisions would be taken at the top so there should be good coordination imposed. However, information flowing up and orders flowing down will take time.
In high decentralisation, each department could make its own decisions with little regard to other departments, so chaos might result. However, because decision-making is within each department communication between decision-makers and staff will be faster.
mkfatima
- Topics: 17
- Replies: 3
- ☆
Hi sir,
Kindly correct me if i am wrong.
In books i found that direct and indirect discrimination applied differently that confused me.Direct discrimination is one group is less favourable on others.like male candidate selection for specific position.
Indirect discrimination is there is some terms and condition in selecion like color of eye, age, marriage status,hieght etc.
Kindly make me clear on this topic.
mkfatima
Ken Garrett- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.