- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by .
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › case study on CARLILL V CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO. LTD
can i know what is the ‘objective n the goals ‘of this case CARLILL V CARBOLIC case study?
And describe the whole problem of this case study?
Because i already read this story but i not sure how to do it,can give me some guide pls
Can you make an offer to the world at large? That was the question
Not before Carlill case but Courts said ‘Yes’ in a ‘reward’ situation
Other defences claimed by Carbolic included:
– no consideration moving from Carlill
– no notification of acceptance by Carlill
– no intention by Carbolic to create legal relations
– time period for claimants
Better?
so this is the objective n the goal n the whole problem ?
To determine whether it is possible to make an offer to the world at large?
Yes, that was the core of the dispute
OK?
How about this DONOGHUE v STEVENSON (1932) case?
I just want to comprehend about this 2 case,because it is important, the question also same as above only different case, TQ
Is it possible to take action against a party not directly involved in a transaction?
Where that party is a manufacturer, that party owes a duty of care to those people who will be using / consuming those goods made by the manufacturer
Is that better?
yes,tqvm
Yvw!
