- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by .
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2024 exams, Get your discount code >>
Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA LW Corporate and Business Law Forums › case names or full desciption of cases
ACCA F4 (ENGLISH) questions [ *** please advise *** ]
hi everyone
please advise when when I answer knowledge based questions and give as example names of cases, do I need to tell what happened in the cases or it is enogh just to tell the case names. Thank you
I have referred to some model answers – they write brief description about the case. So I guess that helps and is the way to answer!
Read Mike’s article on F4 exam technique – he says that it’s not necessary to know the name of the case nor the story behind the case. What is important is that you remember the principle of law which the case is illustrating.
He says it’s good to know the case name – if you can remember it in the exam – or even the name of just one of the parties. But the story is not relevant for F4 exam success. You may find that you have to say something like “In the windmill case ….” if you can’t remember Hadley v Baxendale