• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Business Valuation – Pursuit Co Jun 11 v Chikepe Co Mar/Jun 18

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Business Valuation – Pursuit Co Jun 11 v Chikepe Co Mar/Jun 18

  • This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 31, 2021 at 8:11 pm #615625
    adamk123
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Hi

    I have been comparing the above two business valuations questions and wanted to understand the difference on the calculation of the PV after 4 years using DVM.

    Pursuit: DVM x 1.13^-4

    Chikepe: DVM x 0.735

    So, Pursuit uses the cost of capital of 13% and Chikepe uses the PV factor on 8%.

    My questions:
    1. What distinguishes the two?
    2. What are the key indicators that determine which method to use?
    3. Why is to the power of -4 used?

    Many thanks in advance.

    April 1, 2021 at 9:53 am #615652
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    There is no difference in the two calculations whatsoever. They have just been typed differently by the examiner in his answer – in one case calculating the discount factor using the formula and in the other cases getting the discount factor from the tables. You could have done it either way for both of the questions.

    In the case of Pursuit, the dividend valuation formula has been used on the flows that inflate after 4 years and so the result from the formula is the PV in 4 years time which then needs discounting for 4 years at 13%. You should remember from school that 1.13^-4 is the same as 1/(1.13^4) and is the normal discount factor (it is just an easier way for it to be typed). You could instead have got the discount factor from the tables for 4 years at 13%.

    In the case of Chikepe, it is exactly the same for the same reasons. They have multiplied by the 4 year discount factor at 8% (although the answer has just used the figure from the tables instead of typing out the formula).

    May 15, 2021 at 5:58 pm #620689
    my life
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 36
    • ☆

    Hi Mr. John. I have a question concerning the specimen exam (question 3 b). It’s about the calculation of the “PV of annual premium in perpetuity”. I want to know why the post-tax premium of 159.3 has been divided by the WACC of 7% and not discounted as usual? My understanding is that we should rather discount at 7% and not divide. I am a bit confused. Thank you.

    May 16, 2021 at 9:51 am #620734
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You have already asked about the same thing, and I have already answered you!!

    They have discounted at 7%.

    You should remember from Paper MA and Paper FM that the discount factor for a perpetuity is 1/r where r is the interest rate. So to discount at 7% they multiply by 1/0.07 (which is dividing by 0.07 or 7%).

    May 16, 2021 at 10:47 am #620749
    my life
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 36
    • ☆

    Ok Sir I got it. The other day when I asked that question I couldn’t find your answer that’s why I asked again. Thank you very much.

    May 16, 2021 at 3:07 pm #620757
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘Business Valuation – Pursuit Co Jun 11 v Chikepe Co Mar/Jun 18’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • thienan0110 on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Venoth on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in