• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

BURYEC Co (MarJun17)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › BURYEC Co (MarJun17)

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 2, 2022 at 12:03 am #657100
    rr9125
    Participant
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    My query is in relation to Buryec Co’s b(ii) that requires us to calculate the NPV of the Currency swap.

    My understanding of estimating the value of currency swap was that we would compare CF using the swap rate against CF using forward rate(or future rate) and work out the difference(gain/loss) which will be discounted using the DF.

    So the part I did not understand was from year 3 workings where Buryec receives $7,500m back as well as the interest income of $600m from the investment. In here, model answer worked out the receipt of $7500 using the swap rate (for the preagreed amount of $5000m) and future rate for the rest of the amount of $1500 which i understand and is fine.

    But when it came to calculating the CF using forward/futures rate, the model answer translated only the income of $600m using future rate and added this amount with the translated figure from above $7500 (instead of taking the difference between swap translated fig and forward rate translated figure). However, i thought we had to translate the $5000 (part of $7500) too using the futures rate so that we could compare the two equivalent euro amounts ($5000 – once using Forward rate and once using swap rate) to work out the gain/loss from the swap from year 3? And, apply the discount factor of 14% to the net value and so on to arrive at the NPV

    So, please could you clarify why we did not calculate the future spot value of $7,500 using the swap rate and compared that against the Euro(715+329)?

    I hope i made sense and thank you for your help.

    Kind regards,
    Rai

    June 2, 2022 at 9:12 am #657119
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The exchange rates to be used depend on what is agreed by the parties. There is no standard rule which is why this question states specifically what was agreed.

    The question states twice that the swap of the principal (which is $5,000) is to be converted at todays spot rate (0.1430) and therefore all the other flows will be converted at whatever the exchange rates are forecast to be (which is not the same as forward rates – we do not know the forward rates).

    Therefore at time 3, the initial principal of $5,000 is converted at the current spot rate of 0.1430, and the remaining $2,500 together with the annual income of $600 are converted at the forecast exchange rate at time 3 of 0.1315.

    June 2, 2022 at 2:05 pm #657137
    rr9125
    Participant
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    Sorry, I am not clear yet.

    In year 3, i thought we had to calculate the the value of $5000 using the agreed swap rate and the forecast rate too, so that we could work out the gain and loss from using these two rates – that will eventually contribute to the overall calculation of the swap valuation?

    June 2, 2022 at 3:21 pm #657147
    rr9125
    Participant
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    I think i understand actually – i confused valuing Currency swap with valuing the gain and loss from currency swap which are two different things.

    June 2, 2022 at 3:39 pm #657152
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – they are different.

    Great if you are now clear (but if not then do ask again 🙂 )

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • The topic ‘BURYEC Co (MarJun17)’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Govere on The use of ratios and comparisons in auditing
  • John Moffat on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in