• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

BPP EXAM KIT QUESTION NO 116 AM COMPANY

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › BPP EXAM KIT QUESTION NO 116 AM COMPANY

  • This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 2, 2022 at 4:31 pm #649659
    shaunak22
    Participant
    • Topics: 220
    • Replies: 41
    • ☆☆☆

    AM Co will receive a perpetuity starting in 2 years’ time of $10,000 per year,increasing by the rate inflation (which is 2%). what is the present value of perpetuity assuming a money cost of capital of 10.2%?

    in the solution they have in order to use perpetuity factor the annual amount must be constat so calculation need to be done in real term ans they have calcululated real COC and then calculated perpetuity using real cost of capital.

    DOUBT – we could have also calculated the value of perpetuiy as such = 10000(+0.02)/(0.102-0.02) like we do in dividend valuation model when there is constant growth right ?

    DOUBT – is the dividend valuation method wrong ? and when i do calculate in such a manner why is my answer different than the solution shown in the textbook

    March 2, 2022 at 7:05 pm #649682
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54665
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The dividend valuation method is not wrong and will give the same answer.

    However it assumes that the first receipt will be in 1 years time (and that Do is the current amount). Neither is the case here and so the answer from the dividend valuation method need adjusting.

    March 2, 2022 at 8:16 pm #649686
    shaunak22
    Participant
    • Topics: 220
    • Replies: 41
    • ☆☆☆

    1 year discount factor @10.2% =0.907 & 2 year discount factor @10.2% =0.823

    even if i use the dividend valuation model to find the present value of the perpetuity at year 2 i get (10000*(1+0.02))/(0.102-0.02) = 124390.24

    and if i discount 124390 using 1 year dicsount facto i get (124390*0.907) =112821.73

    and if i discount 124390 using 2 year dicsount facto i get (124390*0.823) =102372.97

    DOUNT – neither of the answer matches to the ans shown in th textbook aven after adjusting the present value to time zero why is that

    March 3, 2022 at 7:40 am #649705
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54665
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The dividend valuation model gives the PV now if the first dividend in in 1 years time.

    Your calculation of 124390 gives the PV at time 2 of the dividends starting from time 3.
    You need to discount this for 2 years and also add on the PV of the dividend of 10,000 at time 2.

    Have you watched my free lectures working through chapter 15 of our free lecture notes, because example 7 illustrates how to deal with the problem.

    November 19, 2022 at 1:23 am #671832
    eiffabat
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi sir, I’ve encountered the same problem. If I use the dividend valuation method, to discount 124390 and 10000 to year 0, do we use 8% rate? If I use 8% rate, then my answer will be like this :

    pv = (124390*0.857) + (10000*0.857)
    = $115,172

    The answer given is $115,740. Does my answer differ from the actual answer due to rounding?

    November 19, 2022 at 11:50 am #671855
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54665
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – it is due to the fact that the tables are rounded to 3 decimal places.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • MikeLittle on Civil Law, Common Law, Criminal Law – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • beata443c on Civil Law, Common Law, Criminal Law – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • heary123@ on Group SFP – Unrealised profit and inventory in transit – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • heary123@ on Group SFP – Unrealised profit and inventory in transit – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on PM Chapter 15 Questions Financial Performance Measurement

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in