• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

BPP Exam kit

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › BPP Exam kit

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 30, 2016 at 1:01 pm #342123
    Saimon
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 55
    • ☆☆

    Bpp exam kit (131. RB co) question (b)

    Sir the answer script has suggested for Market skimming and Penetration pricing as alternative

    i understood the logic behind the penetration pricing but i can’t see any logic behind choosing market skimming as alternative, as in the passage it has been stated that “cost are in line with budget but profit are declining” which means company is losing market share on the other hand competitor are responding to our price by undercutting their price in order to gain more market share. So in such circumstance using market skimming wouldn’t it be to risky

    Sir can you plz explain this to me?????

    ooooo and another thing, can i use marginal cost plus pricing instead of market skimming in question (b).would it be logical?????

    October 1, 2016 at 1:23 am #342148
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I am sorry but I do not have the BPP Revision Kit with me because I am away on vacation until October 12.

    From what you have written it does seem that market skimming is not really appropriate. I certainly wouldn’t suggest cost plus pricing on the wording as you have typed it.

    October 1, 2016 at 8:02 am #342154
    Saimon
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 55
    • ☆☆

    Sir question has asked me to suggest two alternative.i don’t see any other alternative except “marginal cost plus pricing” and in the passage company used “cost plus pricing” which includes overhead using absorption cost.

    October 1, 2016 at 6:29 pm #342184
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If the company is losing market share because competitors are undercutting their prices, then although they will obviously need to charge over the marginal cost to be profitable, using cost plus pricing does not seem such a good idea.

    I will look at the exact question when I return from vacation.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in