Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA AFM Advanced Financial Management Forums › Blipton International
- This topic has 11 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by petrochina.
- AuthorPosts
- May 11, 2010 at 5:44 am #43836
Hi,
This is in the BPP Exam Kit in the Mock Exam section Mock Exam 1- Q1). I am having trouble understanding how they came up with the nominal cash flow figures on the return phase side. Been tryin to work it through to see how they arrived at it but to no avail. Please help. Thank you in advance.
May 11, 2010 at 1:10 pm #60238you have to multiply it wid by the uk inflated rate that is given 2.5%
so the nominal cash flow is 52000 x (1.025) ^2 = 54633
for the next year it will be 490000 x (1.025) ^3 = 527676 and so on.i am not sure abt the reason behind it..will confirm and let u know soon. hope this helped!!
May 12, 2010 at 4:43 am #60239AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Because cashflows r in real terms.We have top mak it in absolute terms.
May 12, 2010 at 6:41 pm #60240Yes that is correct.
Nominal cash flows = actual cash flows (including inflation)
Current price cash flows = cash flows ignoring inflation (and so therefore need inflating).Similarly, the nominal cost of capital is the actual cost of capital, whereas the real cost of capital is the cost of capital with the inflation removed.
May 13, 2010 at 3:46 am #60241@johnmoffat said:
Yes that is correct.
Nominal cash flows = actual cash flows (including inflation)
Current price cash flows = cash flows ignoring inflation (and so therefore need inflating).Similarly, the nominal cost of capital is the actual cost of capital, whereas the real cost of capital is the cost of capital with the inflation removed.
OK thank you very much. I couldnt understand how come I wasnt getting the answer. Thanks again. I’ll try it again.
October 27, 2014 at 11:44 pm #206317Good day sir can you illustrate the calculation for the terminal value. I cannot get an appropriate answer.
October 28, 2014 at 4:38 pm #206433The question says that the cost of construction is $6.2M.
It also says that property values are expected to increase by 8% p.a..So in 6 years time we will expect it to have increased to $6.2M x 1.08^6
(PS In future, if you want me to answer then please ask in the Ask the Tutor forum. This forum is for students to help each other.)
October 21, 2015 at 1:52 pm #278184Hi,
could you please advice how did the examiner came to 0·6552 Forex rate at 31 dec 2009?
As for me rate should be calculated in accourdance with PPP formula (dollars should be the base currency) so
1,4925 x 1,025/1,048 = 1.4597
if we inverse it it gives 1/1.4597 = 0.685…
October 21, 2015 at 1:53 pm #278186Sir, could you please answer the question I posted…
October 21, 2015 at 2:21 pm #278190Sir no need to answer, I got it, there is a trick:
PPP formula from formula sheet could be only applied in the following order:
e.g. if we take $/pound spot x-rate ($ first here) we should multiply it by $ inflation/pound inflation ($ first here again)
October 21, 2015 at 4:16 pm #278227Petrochina: This is not the Ask the Tutor Forum – I do not regularly look in this forum. It is for students to help each other (and I usually only comment here if someone is writing something wrong that confuses other people).
If you want me to answer then you should ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum.
(And there is a free lecture on forecasting future spot rates, which would have solved the problem !! I trust that you are watching the free lectures 🙂 )
October 21, 2015 at 4:25 pm #278233ok)
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.