Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA APM Exams › BCG Matrix
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 21 hours ago by
crystal096.
- AuthorPosts
- February 18, 2026 at 9:56 pm #724762
Hi Ken,
I am looking at the June 2022 paper Qii here for your reference (https://www.acowtancy.com/exams/acca-apm/cbe-question/feb-2025-genuine-1ii-t-3?fsid=0a8bd4516e56659dd8146fc719652c66940455cc)
I wanted to clarify some KPIs I identified for Essan (the Star) and Fada (the problem child).
For Essan, I identified revenue growth as a KPI as I explained that Stars should be heavily invested in in order to support its growth, therefore to see if this investment has positively contributed to performance you would expect to see strong revenue growth, hence I identified this as a KPI.
I can see the markscheme says ROI or RI which I understand but would revenue growth also score any marks here?
Could marketing spend have been a KPI too? The scenario mentions Essans product requires heavy spend on brand-building so for marketing cost you would expect significant spending to maintain relevance since there is high competition and the division would need to demonstrate through this marketing why its premium fridges are high quality for its target audience of wealthier markets.
For Fada, the problem child I thought that profitability of each product would have been an important measure because if there are weak financial results and technical difficulties this would drag down the overall performance of Calavie?
The markscheme identifies revenue growth here, but surely if its a problem child profitability would be relevant too? The markscheme points out the fact they are in early stages of development so profit-based measures may not be suitable, so im guessing my answer there would not have scored any marks can I confirm this please?
Also, maybe I am thinking/looking at this through the wrong lens but where the markscheme also identifies R&D for the problem child, my brain doesnt seem to understand why. Wouldnt R&D be pointless for a problem child because you wouldnt want to waste more time researching a problematic product?
Thank you!
February 19, 2026 at 10:14 am #7247681 Essan: star = high market share and high growth rate. To maintain that position you have to ensure you keep your market share in a growing market so revenue growth rate is fine.
2 Yes, marketing spend is important (NB stars often said to be cash flow neutral because of the high marketing spend needed to maintain star position).
3 Problem children are unlikely to be very profitable because of their low market share and consequent lack of economies of scale. If thy are going to stay with the problem child (rather than abandoning it) high expenditure is needed and you should be anxious that this results in higher and higher revenue as you gain market share.
4 R&D can be important for problem children. One way to gaining a higher market share for the product is to bring out an improved, enhanced product so that you beat the competition.
February 19, 2026 at 8:03 pm #724774Thanks a lot for the clarity, really appreciate it!
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘BCG Matrix’ is closed to new replies.
