• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Congratulations to Jamil from Pakistan and Jeeva from Malaysia - Global Prize winners!
see all ACCA December 2022 Genius Hunt Competition winners >>

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

Awdry Part b) M/J ’19

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Awdry Part b) M/J ’19

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 4, 2021 at 9:30 am #642471
    Noah098
    Member
    • Topics: 935
    • Replies: 352
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Ma’am could you confirm if we can write only evidences and not go on describing matters to get full marks in part b)’s each subpart? I understand that most of the evidence gets derived from the matters and accounting treatments that we explain, but I feel there are times when am not sure about the treatment or application of a particular standard, so I was wondering if I could get all marks from evidence? and not waste my time thinking about matters which am unsure of

    Like is that allowed? or there is some sort of hidden cap? from the marking scheme its not clear whether the examiner would be fine with the approach hence asking…

    December 4, 2021 at 10:19 am #642474
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 100
    • Replies: 6794
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    There could be a cap that isn’t published as the marking schemes that the markers use are more detailed than those published. So the examiner could instruct markers to cap matters and evidence each at 6, say, for an overall cap of 8 marks.

    Also, if you haven’t properly identified the matters it is more likely that you will write non-relevant evidence that will not earn marks. If for example, an issue is impairment, there will be no marks for generic evidence regarding depreciation.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

 

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant Applied Skills exams is available NOW

NEW! Download the ACCA Pass Guide

FREE Verifiable CPD for ACCA Members

ACCA mock exams and debrief videos

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

ACCA CBE 2023 Exams

Instant Poll * How was your exam, and what was the result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • Iby2012 on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Iby2012 on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Iby2012 on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • baraka42 on PM Chapter 13 Questions Standard Costing and Basic Variance Analysis
  • baraka42 on PM Chapter 13 Questions Standard Costing and Basic Variance Analysis

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy