• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Awdry Part b) M/J ’19

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Awdry Part b) M/J ’19

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 4, 2021 at 9:30 am #642471
    Noah098
    Member
    • Topics: 935
    • Replies: 352
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Ma’am could you confirm if we can write only evidences and not go on describing matters to get full marks in part b)’s each subpart? I understand that most of the evidence gets derived from the matters and accounting treatments that we explain, but I feel there are times when am not sure about the treatment or application of a particular standard, so I was wondering if I could get all marks from evidence? and not waste my time thinking about matters which am unsure of

    Like is that allowed? or there is some sort of hidden cap? from the marking scheme its not clear whether the examiner would be fine with the approach hence asking…

    December 4, 2021 at 10:19 am #642474
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 134
    • Replies: 8304
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    There could be a cap that isn’t published as the marking schemes that the markers use are more detailed than those published. So the examiner could instruct markers to cap matters and evidence each at 6, say, for an overall cap of 8 marks.

    Also, if you haven’t properly identified the matters it is more likely that you will write non-relevant evidence that will not earn marks. If for example, an issue is impairment, there will be no marks for generic evidence regarding depreciation.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • o1lim on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Replacement – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in