Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Associate sell to Parent Co.
- This topic has 7 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- June 3, 2014 at 10:07 pm #173467
Hi Mike… My last Question in this session..
what will be the treatment in CSFP and P or L if parent inventory include goods supplied by associate.June 4, 2014 at 7:12 am #173527Put the whole of the pup through the associate.
Then, in working W3, take our share of the associate’s adjusted profits and, in working W5, the investment in associate line “our share of associate post acquisition retained” is also affected.
In debits and credits, Dr retained earnings with our share of the pup, Credit investment in associate
Ok?
May 9, 2015 at 1:28 pm #244942Hi mike, should the inventory be reduced by the amount of profit though?
May 9, 2015 at 3:20 pm #244958It’s an irrelevance! The Associate’s profit after tax will be reduced by any pup.
Working W5a, Investment in Associate, is calculated as:
Cost of investment
+ Share of post acq retained (as adjusted for the pup)
– Any impairmentsWorking W5b, Interest in Associate’s results for the year is calculated as:
Our percentage share of Associate’s profit after tax (as adjusted for the pup!)
Ok?
May 9, 2015 at 3:33 pm #244964Is it the same treatment regardless of whether P sells to A or A sells to P?
I can’t see how in the case where A sells to P then why isn’t P’s inventory overstated with profit element?
May 9, 2015 at 5:11 pm #244980There’s a strange thing! When parent sells to SUBSIDIARY, it’s the subsidiary’s inventory that is overvalued but the pup adjustment goes through the parent’s retained earnings, not the subsidiary’s.
We really are not interested in whose inventory is overvalued because
(a + b – c) is the same as (a – c + b)Technically when parent sells to associate, the adjustment should be to remove just the group’s share of the pup from the parent retained earnings
But the result is the same (ie the sofp still balances) when you make the full pup adjustment through the associate
And that’s the easier way.
There are differences in the figures for retained earnings and for investment in associate but, as I said, the sofp still balances
Ok?
May 9, 2015 at 5:57 pm #244995Thank you mike. I think my problem is getting tied down in detail rather than just learning the rules and applying them.
Thanks
May 9, 2015 at 6:10 pm #244999Yes, ok, but it’s easier to learn the rules if you can understand what’s happening 🙂
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.