• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

APV ( adjusted present value) question strayer

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › APV ( adjusted present value) question strayer

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 11, 2014 at 7:56 am #204129
    chicababes1991
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    hi sir
    can you please help me out

    i am trying to understand the logic behind the APV

    step 1: is to calculate the base case NPV

    we assume that the $25 m will be raised through 100% equity finance

    but when it says to calculate the issue costs it says in the question that issue cost is 4% of the equity finance

    it only took 10m x 4% = $ 0.40m

    so we are assuming that the issue cost is included in the equity finance of $10m

    so we need to remove the issue cost in the $10m and the issue cost in the $5m debt finance because the issue cost will change if we borrow more equity finance

    why was it not removed

    if the issue cost was not included you would have calculated it differently
    ie: 10m x 100/96 = 10.4166m

    but clearly in the $10m it was included

    so that means the total amount to be raised via equity finance in the base case NPV cannot be $25m

    because the issue costs of both the equity and debt finance is included

    can you please help me out. maybe i am wrongly understanding something

    thank you very much

    October 11, 2014 at 10:06 am #204144
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The answer has assumed that only $10M in total was raised from equity, and that the issue costs were paid out of internal funds, so that there remained $10 from the issue for investment in the project.

    If you had assumed as you wish to (that the equity raised was actually a little more than $10M in order to cover the issue costs) then you would still have got full marks (even though obviously the final answer would have been slightly different).

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • thienan0110 on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Venoth on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in