- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- April 26, 2023 at 11:49 pm #683619
Hello Mr John
My question is why are we not using interest rate at 2.2% (2.5% – 30 basis points) to calculate tax shield
And my other question is why is the value of the Subsidy not calculated this way
Saving
61.2m × (5% – 2.2%) × (1-0.3) × AF @ yr 5-yr1(since tax is paid 1 year in arrears)When calculating
I got the base case NPV of -0.93 correct
PV of issue costs 2.55 correctHow ever PV of tax shield is wrong
As well as value of SubsidyQuestion: Hazeltine Co
Background
Hazeltine Co is based in the USA. It is listed . Its directors collectively own 60% of the equity share capital with the balance owned primarily by financial institutions.
Hazeltine Co’s growth has been based upon the development of computer hardware primarily for smaller PC’s and tablet computers. However. the directors have taken a strategic decision to diversify operations and to invest in software to allow the remote exam invigilation (called proctoring) for the education sector. The directors believe this will be a fast-growing area as tt{i roll out of artificial intelligence (Al) continues to develop.Jain Co
Jain Co is a large, listed company also based in the USA. Jain Co’s geared cost of equity is estimated to be and it has a WACC of 8%. Its asset beta is 1.25. The risk-free rate is 2.5 % and the equity risk premium is 5.2%.Financing the investment
The innovative nature of this new venture will allow Hazeltine Co to finance all of the $61.2 million needed for the initial investment in the facilities via a subsidised government loan. The company has retained cash to fund the initial working capital required.
The govemment loan scheme will require it to be repaid at the end of the four years. Issue costs of 4% of the gross finance would be payable. These will be paid from retained cash reserves and are not tax allowable. Interest would be payable at a rate of 30 basis points below the risk-free rate of 2.5% currently, the standard bank loan interest rate for this type of loan stands at 5%pa.Answer
3) PV of the tax shield on the interest to be paid
$61.2m × (2.50-0.30)% × Annuity Factor T2-T5 @ 5%
=1.364) PV of the Net of Tax Subsidy
Interest not paid
$61.2m × (5.00 -2.20)% × Annuity Factor T1-T4 @ 5%
=6.08Tax shield lost
$61.2m × (5.00 – 2.20)% × -30% × AF T2 -T5 @5%
=-1.74PV of the Finance Cash Flow
=3.15Base case NPV -0.93
PV of the Finance
Cash Flow -3.15
APV 2.23April 27, 2023 at 10:00 am #683645As far as the tax shield is concerned we discount the tax saving at either the normal cost of borrowing (5%) or at the risk free rate (2.5%). The examiner always allows either rate to be used even though obviously the final answer is different depending which rate is used. (I do explain the logic for the choice of the two rates in my free lectures).
For the subsidy benefit, the saving is the after-tax interest saving. However the interest itself is first saved in the first year, but the tax effect on the saving occurs for the first time in the second year (because of the one year delay in tax), That is why the two things have to be discounted separately.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.