• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

APV

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › APV

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 26, 2023 at 11:49 pm #683619
    Nercia@1234
    Participant
    • Topics: 21
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Hello Mr John

    My question is why are we not using interest rate at 2.2% (2.5% – 30 basis points) to calculate tax shield

    And my other question is why is the value of the Subsidy not calculated this way

    Saving
    61.2m × (5% – 2.2%) × (1-0.3) × AF @ yr 5-yr1(since tax is paid 1 year in arrears)

    When calculating
    I got the base case NPV of -0.93 correct
    PV of issue costs 2.55 correct

    How ever PV of tax shield is wrong
    As well as value of Subsidy

    Question: Hazeltine Co

    Background
    Hazeltine Co is based in the USA. It is listed . Its directors collectively own 60% of the equity share capital with the balance owned primarily by financial institutions.
    Hazeltine Co’s growth has been based upon the development of computer hardware primarily for smaller PC’s and tablet computers. However. the directors have taken a strategic decision to diversify operations and to invest in software to allow the remote exam invigilation (called proctoring) for the education sector. The directors believe this will be a fast-growing area as tt{i roll out of artificial intelligence (Al) continues to develop.

    Jain Co
    Jain Co is a large, listed company also based in the USA. Jain Co’s geared cost of equity is estimated to be and it has a WACC of 8%. Its asset beta is 1.25. The risk-free rate is 2.5 % and the equity risk premium is 5.2%.

    Financing the investment
    The innovative nature of this new venture will allow Hazeltine Co to finance all of the $61.2 million needed for the initial investment in the facilities via a subsidised government loan. The company has retained cash to fund the initial working capital required.
    The govemment loan scheme will require it to be repaid at the end of the four years. Issue costs of 4% of the gross finance would be payable. These will be paid from retained cash reserves and are not tax allowable. Interest would be payable at a rate of 30 basis points below the risk-free rate of 2.5% currently, the standard bank loan interest rate for this type of loan stands at 5%pa.

    Answer

    3) PV of the tax shield on the interest to be paid

    $61.2m × (2.50-0.30)% × Annuity Factor T2-T5 @ 5%
    =1.36

    4) PV of the Net of Tax Subsidy
    Interest not paid
    $61.2m × (5.00 -2.20)% × Annuity Factor T1-T4 @ 5%
    =6.08

    Tax shield lost
    $61.2m × (5.00 – 2.20)% × -30% × AF T2 -T5 @5%
    =-1.74

    PV of the Finance Cash Flow
    =3.15

    Base case NPV -0.93
    PV of the Finance
    Cash Flow -3.15
    APV 2.23

    April 27, 2023 at 10:00 am #683645
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54699
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    As far as the tax shield is concerned we discount the tax saving at either the normal cost of borrowing (5%) or at the risk free rate (2.5%). The examiner always allows either rate to be used even though obviously the final answer is different depending which rate is used. (I do explain the logic for the choice of the two rates in my free lectures).

    For the subsidy benefit, the saving is the after-tax interest saving. However the interest itself is first saved in the first year, but the tax effect on the saving occurs for the first time in the second year (because of the one year delay in tax), That is why the two things have to be discounted separately.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • o1lim on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Replacement – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in