• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Allowance

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FA – FIA FFA › Allowance

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 1, 2014 at 4:47 pm #193226
    XXY
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    XY Co has a balance of receivables of $250,000. It wishes to provide a specific allowance of 60% on a debt of $20,000. It also wishes to set up a general allowance of 2% of receivables. What is the charge to the income statement?
    Specific allowance
    60% × $20,000 = $12,000
    General allowance
    $
    Total receivables 250,000
    Specific provision (20,000)*
    Balance 230,000
    General allowance = 2% × $230,000 = $4,600
    Total allowance charged in income statement = $12,000 + $4,600
    = $16,600

    Hi sir. I don’t understand why we remove 2000 against 250000, not 12000?

    September 1, 2014 at 5:07 pm #193231
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This is a little trick to watch out for.

    You are happy (I think) that for the debt of $20,000 we need a specific allowance of $12,000.

    The general allowance is 2% (in this case) of all other debts. If we simply took out 12000 and then calculated 2% on the balance we would end up with more that 60% allowance for the problem debt. The 2% is always based on the receivables (after removing irrecoverables) less those debts where there has been a specific allowance made – whether the specific allowance was for all of the ‘problem’ debt (as is usually the case) or whether it was only for part of the ‘problem’ debt (as in this case).

    I hope that is clear 🙂

    September 2, 2014 at 9:32 am #193282
    XXY
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    in this case 20000 is ‘problem’ debt, yes? Thanks sir. now it is clear 🙂

    September 2, 2014 at 2:46 pm #193321
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Great!

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • EricObi on IAS 37 – Best estimate – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in