• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Alecto Co (Pilot paper)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Alecto Co (Pilot paper)

  • This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 17, 2018 at 9:15 am #463377
    kevinchin
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Mr. John,

    I have calculated the premium for Option on future contracts using the following approach.
    At strike price of 96.00, $22m x 0.163% x 5/12 = $14,942
    At strike price of 96.50, $22m x 0.581% x 5/12 = $53,258

    I couldn’t understand the workings given by the examiner. Could you please explain why premium for Option on future contracts are calculated as 16.3 x $25 x 37? Why 0.163% suddenly become 16.3?

    July 17, 2018 at 6:56 pm #463545
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It is because he has used ticks, and $25 is the tick value.

    I do explain about ticks in my lectures, although (as I explain in the lectures) you do not need to ever use ticks to get the amount – that is up to you. I never bother using ticks 🙂

    August 24, 2019 at 5:25 pm #528683
    azeeza247
    Participant
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    The value of the premium differs slightly when calculated using the premium % as opposed to using ticks.

    Is it still okay to use the %’s instead of ticks?

    August 24, 2019 at 7:44 pm #528702
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No – the answer will be exactly the same however you calculate the premium.

    If you found that to be a problem with a specific question then say which question and I will explain.

    (I assume that you have watched my free lectures on foreign exchange risk management?)

    August 25, 2019 at 2:09 am #528715
    azeeza247
    Participant
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    This very question sir.

    Re – watched the lecture and figured where u went wrong. Thank you so much 🙂

    August 25, 2019 at 10:14 am #528742
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54831
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘Alecto Co (Pilot paper)’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • tehreem21 on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in