- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- The topic ‘Advice on thought proces 2’ is closed to new replies.
How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for December 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Advice on thought proces 2
To answer your 1st question, no they were seperate items….but i agree that they test those assertions you mentioned.
Other question:
I notice that the acca answers do not state in the answers what assertion is being tested.
In light of that would marks be gained if stated, “in order to confirm rights of the property inspect deed for property.” “In order to confirm existence physically inspect the address of the site stated in the deed”. “To confirm completeness, inspect property tax expense account to gain info of properties owned and then compare to ppe and investment property listing”. “To confirm valuation, inspect valuators report and not the date of the report”
I can think of no good reason why you shouldn’t make clear the point that you are making
Does that answer you?