• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Accounting treatment

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Accounting treatment

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by AvatarMikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 12, 2015 at 5:47 pm #241045
    Avatarshaina
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 12
    • ☆

    Hi,

    Ive gone blank on a question, please can you help..

    If company A sells goods to company B for £500,000 at a mark up of 30%. Company A normally makes a mark up of 70% on its sales. By the year end this sales invoice is outstanding. Mrs Jones owns 100% of the equity shares in Company A and is a director of company B.

    How would the transaction be accounted for in the financial statements for the year?

    April 12, 2015 at 8:44 pm #241051
    AvatarMikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23368
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Well! Where to begin? The question doesn’t rule out the possibility that Mrs Jones has control over company B as well as being just a director.

    If that’s the case, then company B should be consolidated as a subsidiary

    Even if it isn’t a subsidiary, there is a relationship between companies A and B by dint of Mrs Jones interest in company B and her ownership of company A.

    If 500 have been sold at a mark up of 30% then clearly 100/130 x 500 is the cost price of these goods and should normally be sold for:

    100/130 x 170 is approximately 1,300

    So normal selling price would be 1,300

    If we ARE to consolidate, then we need to determine the original entries that recorded the sale, compare those entries with what should have been recorded had it been a transaction at arms length, and then make adjustments on consolidation for the differences and particularly the difference in the pup calculation

    Is that enough?

    April 18, 2015 at 3:18 pm #241722
    Avatarshaina
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 12
    • ☆

    Thank you ! 🙂

    April 18, 2015 at 5:30 pm #241733
    AvatarMikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23368
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • oabilentatiwa on Process Technology and Quality control – CIMA E1
  • Inspire on SWOT Analysis – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • Casair on Statement of cash flows – Example 1 (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Mellytac on Sales Mix Variance – Variance analysis – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • newspring.kr on Group SFP – Example (PUPs) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in